Active Directory Attribute

Attr LDAP Name	Attr Display Name	ADUC Tab	ADUC Field
accountExpires		Account	Account expires
accountNameHistory
aCSPolicyName
adminCount
adminDescription
adminDisplayName
allowedAttributes
allowedAttributesEffective
allowedChildClasses
allowedChildClassesEffective
altSecurityIdentities
assistant	Assistant
badPasswordTime
badPwdCount
bridgeheadServerListBL
c	Country Abbreviation	Address	Country/region
canonicalName		Object	Fully qualified domain name of object
cn	Name
co	Country	Address	Country/region
codePage
comment	Comment
company	Company	Organization	Company
controlAccessRights
countryCode		Address	Country/region
createTimeStamp
dBCSPwd
defaultClassStore
department	Department	Organization	Department
description	Description	General	Description
desktopProfile
destinationIndicator
directReports	Direct Reports	Organization	Direct reports
displayName	Display Name	General	Display name
displayNamePrintable
distinguishedName	X500 Distinguished Name
division	Division
dSASignature
dSCorePropagationData
dynamicLDAPServer
employeeID	Employee ID
extensionName
facsimileTelephoneNumber	Fax Number	Telephones	Fax
flags
fromEntry
frsComputerReferenceBL
fRSMemberReferenceBL
fSMORoleOwner
garbageCollPeriod
generationQualifier	Generational Suffix
givenName	First Name	General	First name
groupMembershipSAM
groupPriority
groupsToIgnore
homeDirectory	Home Folder	Profile	Home folder: Local path/To
homeDrive	Home Drive	Profile	Home folder: Connect
homePhone	Home Phone	Telephones	Home
homePostalAddress	Home Address
info	Notes	Telephones	Notes
initials	Initials	General	Initials
instanceType
internationalISDNNumber	International ISDN Number (Others)
ipPhone	IP Phone Number	Telephones	IP phone
isCriticalSystemObject
isDeleted
isPrivilegeHolder
l	City	Address	City
lastKnownParent
lastLogoff
lastLogon
legacyExchangeDN
lmPwdHistory
localeID
lockoutTime		Account	Account is locked out
logonCount
logonHours		Account	Logon Hours
logonWorkstation
mail	E-Mail Address	General	E-mail
managedObjects
manager	Manager	Organization	Manager
masteredBy
maxStorage
memberOf	Group Membership	Member Of	Member of
mhsORAddress
middleName	Middle Name
mobile	Mobile Number	Telephones	Mobile
modifyTimeStamp
mS-DS-ConsistencyChildCount
mS-DS-ConsistencyGuid
mS-DS-CreatorSID
mSMQDigests
mSMQDigestsMig
mSMQSignCertificates
mSMQSignCertificatesMig
msNPAllowDialin
msNPCallingStationID
msNPSavedCallingStationID
msRADIUSCallbackNumber
msRADIUSFramedIPAddress
msRADIUSFramedRoute
msRADIUSServiceType
msRASSavedCallbackNumber
msRASSavedFramedIPAddress
msRASSavedFramedRoute
name
netbootSCPBL
networkAddress
nonSecurityMemberBL
ntPwdHistory
nTSecurityDescriptor		Security	N/A
o
objectCategory
objectClass		Object	Object class
objectGUID
objectSid
objectVersion
operatorCount
otherFacsimileTelephoneNumber	Fax Number (Others)	Telephones	Fax Number (Others)
otherHomePhone	Home Phone (Others)	Telephones	Home Phone (Others)
otherIpPhone	IP Phone Number (Others)	Telephones	IP Phone Number (Others)
otherLoginWorkstations
otherMailbox	E-Mail Address (Others)
otherMobile	Mobile Number (Others)	Telephones	Mobile Number (Others)
otherPager	Pager Number (Others)	Telephones	Pager Number (Others)
otherTelephone	Phone Number (Others)	General	Phone Number (Others)
otherWellKnownObjects
ou
pager	Pager Number	Telephones	Pager
partialAttributeDeletionList
partialAttributeSet
personalTitle	Title
physicalDeliveryOfficeName	Office Location	General	Office
possibleInferiors
postalAddress
postalCode	ZIP/Postal Code	Address	Zip/Postal Code
postOfficeBox	Post Office Box	Address	P.O. Box
preferredDeliveryMethod
preferredOU
primaryGroupID		Member Of	Primary group
primaryInternationalISDNNumber	International ISDN Number
primaryTelexNumber	Telex Number
profilePath		Profile	Profile path
proxiedObjectName
proxyAddresses
pwdLastSet
queryPolicyBL
registeredAddress
replPropertyMetaData
replUpToDateVector
repsFrom
repsTo
revision
rid
sAMAccountName	Logon Name (pre-Windows 2000)	Account	User logon name (pre-Windows 2000)
sAMAccountType
scriptPath		Profile	Logon script
sDRightsEffective
securityIdentifier
seeAlso
serverReferenceBL
servicePrincipalName
showInAddressBook
showInAdvancedViewOnly
sIDHistory
siteObjectBL
sn	Last Name	General	Last name
st	State/Province	Address	State/province
street
streetAddress	Street Address	Address	Street
subRefs
subSchemaSubEntry
supplementalCredentials
systemFlags
telephoneNumber	Telephone Number	General	Telephone number
teletexTerminalIdentifier
telexNumber	Telex Number (Others)
terminalServer
textEncodedORAddress
thumbnailLogo
thumbnailPhoto
title	Job Title	Organization	Title
tokenGroups
tokenGroupsGlobalAndUniversal
tokenGroupsNoGCAcceptable
unicodePwd
url	Web Page Address (Others)	General	Web Page Address (Others)
userAccountControl		Account	Account options
userCert
userCertificate
userParameters
userPassword
userPrincipalName	Logon Name	Account	User logon name
userSharedFolder
userSharedFolderOther
userSMIMECertificate
userWorkstations	Logon Workstations	Account	Log On To/Logon Workstations
uSNChanged		Object	Current USN
uSNCreated		Object	Original USN
uSNDSALastObjRemoved
USNIntersite
uSNLastObjRem
uSNSource
wbemPath
wellKnownObjects
whenChanged		Object	Modified
whenCreated		Object	Created
wWWHomePage	Web Page Address	General	Web page
x121Address

ASP.NET MVC View Engine Comparison

ASP.NET MVC View Engines (Community Wiki)

Since a comprehensive list does not appear exist, let’s start one here on SO. This can be of great value to the ASP.NET MVC community if people add their experience (esp. anyone who contributed to one of these).  Anything implementing IViewEngine (e.g. VirtualPathProviderViewEngine) is fair game here.  Just alphabetize new View Engines (leaving WebFormViewEngine at the top), and try to be objective in comparisons.

---

System.Web.Mvc.WebFormViewEngine

Design Goals:

A view engine that is used to render a  Web Forms page to the response.

Pros:

• ubiquitous since it ships with ASP.NET MVC
• familiar experience for ASP.NET developers
• IntelliSense
• can choose any language with a CodeDom provider (e.g. C#, VB.NET, F#, Boo, Nemerle)
• on-demand compilation or precompiled views

Cons:

• usage is confused by existence of “classic ASP.NET” patterns which no longer apply in MVC (e.g. ViewState PostBack)
• can contribute to anti-pattern of “tag soup”
• code-block syntax and strong-typing can get in the way
• IntelliSense enforces style not always appropriate for inline code blocks
• can be noisy when designing simple templates

Example:

<%@ Control Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewPage<IEnumerable<Product>>" %> <% if(model.Any()) { %> <ul> <% foreach(var p in model){%> <li><%=p.Name%></li> <%}%> </ul> <%}else{%> <p>No products available</p> <%}%> 

---

Bellevue

Design goals:

• Respect HTML as first-class language as opposed to treating it as “just text”.
• Don’t mess with my HTML! The data binding code (Bellevue code) should be separate from HTML.
• Enforce strict Model-View separation

---

Brail

Design Goals:

The Brail view engine has been ported  from MonoRail to work with the  Microsoft ASP.NET MVC Framework. For  an introduction to Brail, see the  documentation on the Castle project  website.

Pros:

• modeled after “wrist-friendly python syntax”
• On-demand compiled views (but no precompilation available)

Cons:

• designed to be written in the language Boo

Example:

<html> <head> <title>${title}</title> </head> <body> <p>The following items are in the list:</p> <ul><%for element in list: output "<li>${element}</li>"%></ul> <p>I hope that you would like Brail</p> </body> </html> 

---

Hasic

Hasic uses VB.NET’s XML literals instead of strings like most other view engines.

Pros:

• Compile-time checking of valid XML
• Syntax colouring
• Full intellisense
• Compiled views
• Extensibility using regular CLR classes, functions, etc
• Seamless composability and manipulation since it’s regular VB.NET code
• Unit testable

Cons:

• Performance: Builds the whole DOM before sending it to client.

Example:

Protected Overrides Function Body() As XElement Return _ <body> <h1>Hello, World</h1> </body> End Function 

---

NDjango

Design Goals:

NDjango is an implementation of the  Django Template Language on the .NET  platform, using the F# language.

Pros:

• NDjango release 0.9.1.0 seems to be more stable under stress than WebFormViewEngine
• Django Template Editor with syntax colorization, code completion, and as-you-type diagnostics (VS2010 only)
• Integrated with ASP.NET, Castle MonoRail and Bistro MVC frameworks

---

NHaml

Design Goals:

.NET port of Rails Haml view engine.  From the Haml website:

Haml is a markup language that’s used  to cleanly and simply describe the  XHTML of any web document, without the  use of inline code… Haml avoids the  need for explicitly coding XHTML into  the template, because it is actually  an abstract description of the XHTML,  with some code to generate dynamic  content.

Pros:

• terse structure (i.e. D.R.Y.)
• well indented
• clear structure
• C# Intellisense (for VS2008 without ReSharper)

Cons:

• an abstraction from XHTML rather than leveraging familiarity of the markup
• No Intellisense for VS2010

Example:

@type=IEnumerable<Product> - if(model.Any()) %ul - foreach (var p in model) %li= p.Name - else %p No products available 

---

NVelocityViewEngine (MvcContrib)

Design Goals:

A view engine based upon  NVelocity which is a .NET port  of the popular Java project  Velocity.

Pros:

• easy to read/write
• concise view code

Cons:

• limited number of helper methods available on the view
• does not automatically have Visual Studio integration (IntelliSense, compile-time checking of views, or refactoring)

Example:

#foreach ($p in $viewdata.Model) #beforeall <ul> #each <li>$p.Name</li> #afterall </ul> #nodata <p>No products available</p> #end 

---

Razor

Design Goals:

Pros:

• Compact, Expressive, and Fluid
• Easy to Learn
• Is not a new language
• Has great Intellisense
• Unit Testable

Cons:

• No documented API

---

SharpTiles

Design Goals:

SharpTiles is a partial port of JSTL  combined with concept behind the Tiles  framework (as of Mile stone 1).

Pros:

• familiar to Java developers
• XML-style code blocks

Cons:

• …

Example:

<c:if test="${not fn:empty(Page.Tiles)}"> <p class="note"> <fmt:message key="page.tilesSupport"/> </p> </c:if> 

---

Spark View Engine

Design Goals:

The idea is to allow the html to  dominate the flow and the code to fit  seamlessly.

Pros:

• Produces more readable templates
• C# Intellisense  (for VS2008 without ReSharper)
• SparkSense plug-in for VS2010 (works with ReSharper)
• Provides a powerful Bindings feature to get rid of all code in your views and allows you to easily invent your own HTML tags

Cons:

• No clear separation of template logic from literal markup (this can be mitigated by namespace prefixes)

Example:

<viewdata products="IEnumerable[[Product]]"/> <ul if="products.Any()"> <li each="var p in products">${p.Name}</li> </ul> <else> <p>No products available</p> </else> <Form style="background-color:olive;"> <Label For="username" /> <TextBox For="username" /> <ValidationMessage For="username" Message="Please type a valid username." /> </Form> 

---

StringTemplate View Engine MVC

Design Goals:

• Lightweight. No page classes are created.
• Fast. Templates are written to the Response Output stream.
• Cached. Templates are cached, but utilize a FileSystemWatcher to detect  file changes.
• Dynamic. Templates can be generated on the fly in code.
• Flexible. Templates can be nested to any level.
• In line with MVC principles. Promotes separation of UI and Business  Logic. All data is created ahead of  time, and passed down to the template.

Pros:

• familiar to StringTemplate Java developers

Cons:

• simplistic template syntax can interfere with intended output (e.g. jQuery conflict)

---

Wing Beats

Wing Beats is an internal DSL for creating XHTML. It is based on F# and includes an ASP.NET MVC view engine, but can also be used solely for it’s capability of creating XHTML.

Pros:

• Compile-time checking of valid XML
• Syntax colouring
• Full intellisense
• Compiled views
• Extensibility using regular CLR classes, functions, etc
• Seamless composability and manipulation since it’s regular F# code
• Unit testable

Cons:

• You don’t really write HTML but code that represents HTML in a DSL.

---

XsltViewEngine (MvcContrib)

Design Goals:

Builds views from familiar XSLT

Pros:

• widely ubiquitous
• familiar template language for XML developers
• XML-based
• time-tested

Cons:

• functional language style makes flow control difficult

source:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1451319/asp-net-mvc-view-engine-comparison

SSIS Prefix Naming Convention

For Task

Task	Prefix
For Loop Container	FLC
Foreach Loop Container	FELC
Sequence Container	SEQC
ActiveX Script	AXS
Analysis Services Execute DDL	ASE
Analysis Services Processing	ASP
Bulk Insert	BI
Data Flow	DF
Data Mining Query	DMQ
Execute DTS 2000 Package	EDP
Execute Package	EP
Execute Process	EPR
Execute SQL	SQL
File System	FS
FTP	FTP
Message Queue	MQ
Script	SCR
Send Mail	SM
Transfer Database	TDB
Transfer Error Messages	TEM
Transfer Jobs	TJ
Transfer Logins	TL
Transfer Master Stored Procedures	TSP
Transfer SQL Server Objects	TSO
Web Service	WS
WMI Data Reader	WMID
WMI Event Watcher	WMIE
XML	XML

For Component

Component	Prefix
DataReader Source	DR_SRC
Excel Source	EX_SRC
Flat File Source	FF_SRC
OLE DB Source	OLE_SRC
Raw File Source	RF_SRC
XML Source	XML_SRC
Aggregate	AGG
Audit	AUD
Character Map	CHM
Conditional Split	CSP
Copy Column	CPC
Data Conversion	DC
Data Mining Query	DMQ
Derived Column	DER
Export Column	EXP
Fuzzy Grouping	FZG
Fuzzy Lookup	FZL
Import Column	IMPT
Lookup	LKP
Merge	MRG
Merge Join	MRJ
Multicast	MLT
OLE DB Command	CMD
Percentage Sampling	PS
Pivot	PVT
Row Count	RC
Row Sampling	RS
Script Component	SC
Slowly Changing Dimension	SCD
Sort	SRT
Term Extraction	TEX
Term Lookup	TLK
Union All	UAL
Unpivot	UPVT
Data Mining Model Training	DMT_DST
DataReader Destination	DR_DST
Dimension Processing	DP_DST
Excel Destination	EX_DST
Flat File Destination	FF_DST
OLE DB Destination	OLE_DST
Partition Processing	PP_DST
Raw File Destination	RF_DST
Recordset Destination	RS_DST
SQL Server Destination	SS_DST
SQL Server Mobile Destination	SSM_DST

Add new row for repeating table in infopath 2010 programmaticaly

Post it here, so I can remind easily.

Here is the example of code for adding row:

for (int i = 0; i < ids.Length; i++)

{

DataRow selected = tables.Rows[Convert.ToInt32(i)];

if (i == 0)

{

XPathNavigator xDataName = MainDataSource.CreateNavigator().SelectSingleNode(“/my:myFields/my:Visitors/my:VisitorsGroup/my:VisitorName”, NamespaceManager);

xDataName.SetValue(selected[0].ToString());

XPathNavigator xDataGender = MainDataSource.CreateNavigator().SelectSingleNode(“/my:myFields/my:Visitors/my:VisitorsGroup/my:VisitorSex”, NamespaceManager);

xDataGender.SetValue(selected[1].ToString());

XPathNavigator xDataCompany = MainDataSource.CreateNavigator().SelectSingleNode(“/my:myFields/my:Visitors/my:VisitorsGroup/my:VisitorCompany”, NamespaceManager);

xDataCompany.SetValue(selected[2].ToString());

XPathNavigator xDataNOKS = MainDataSource.CreateNavigator().SelectSingleNode(“/my:myFields/my:Visitors/my:VisitorsGroup/my:VisitorNextKin”, NamespaceManager);

xDataNOKS.SetValue(selected[3].ToString());

XPathNavigator xDataDrugs = MainDataSource.CreateNavigator().SelectSingleNode(“/my:myFields/my:Visitors/my:VisitorsGroup/my:VisitorTakingPrescription”, NamespaceManager);

xDataDrugs.SetValue(selected[4].ToString());

XPathNavigator xDataCert = MainDataSource.CreateNavigator().SelectSingleNode(“/my:myFields/my:Visitors/my:VisitorsGroup/my:VisitorHUETSOLAS”, NamespaceManager);

xDataCert.SetValue(selected[5].ToString());

XPathNavigator xDataLast = MainDataSource.CreateNavigator().SelectSingleNode(“/my:myFields/my:Visitors/my:VisitorsGroup/my:VisitorDateLastonFacility”, NamespaceManager);

xDataLast.SetValue(selected[6].ToString());

XPathNavigator xDataInduction = MainDataSource.CreateNavigator().SelectSingleNode(“/my:myFields/my:Visitors/my:VisitorsGroup/my:VisitorInduction”, NamespaceManager);

xDataInduction.SetValue(selected[7].ToString());

}

else

{

string myNamespace = NamespaceManager.LookupNamespace(“my”);

using (XmlWriter writer = MainDataSource.CreateNavigator().SelectSingleNode(

“/my:myFields/my:Visitors”, NamespaceManager).AppendChild())

{

writer.WriteStartElement(

“VisitorsGroup”, myNamespace);

writer.WriteElementString(

“VisitorName”, myNamespace, selected[0].ToString());

writer.WriteElementString(

“VisitorSex”, myNamespace, selected[1].ToString());

writer.WriteElementString(

“VisitorCompany”, myNamespace, selected[2].ToString());

writer.WriteElementString(

“VisitorNextKin”, myNamespace, selected[3].ToString());

writer.WriteElementString(

“VisitorTakingPrescription”, myNamespace, selected[4].ToString());

writer.WriteElementString(

“VisitorHUETSOLAS”, myNamespace, selected[5].ToString());

writer.WriteElementString(

“VisitorDateLastonFacility”, myNamespace, selected[6].ToString());

writer.WriteElementString(

“VisitorInduction”, myNamespace, selected[7].ToString());

writer.WriteEndElement();

writer.Close();

}

}

}

Newbie Made Mistake on SAP part 1

I wanted to make a new program on SAP but always was getting this notice.

which means i had to input SAP license key while I just use SAP license trial for 90 days and it still have activated.

Then ding…

The solution came up while I was “googling”

The program named should be all started with “Y” or “Z”.

And voila~~ what a stupid mistake.